Candidate meta example: stopping a second master before publication

← Operations Web Function

Candidate meta example: stopping a second master before publication

Candidate redacted meta example — not yet Task Library accepted · Operations Web Function 0.1.0.

Download the complete plugin · Source SHA-256: 9b156ee86c45278593a4cf6dbcc4fe0efae15b37853e46e5a116f560f438f903

The first release candidate was packaged and fully validated when the final review asked whether it overlapped existing skills and whether every run fed the Task Library, definitive articles, and meta articles. The package described learning, but it did not carry a machine-readable capability map or an enforceable rule that the canonical marketplace outranked its generated pages and ZIP.

Publishing it unchanged would have created a subtle second source of truth: ten polished skill pages with no explicit relationship to existing security-audit, client-access-checklist, recursive-self-improvement-qa, skill-registry, Task Library tasks, or the unresolved copies of fleet-uptime-monitor.

The release was stopped before upload and corrected in the candidate source:

  • added registry/capability-map.json, mapping every packaged skill exactly once;
  • classified each skill as an orchestrator, an interface around an existing method, or a candidate new interface;
  • named the existing skill owners and exact Task Library references each Web Function artifact delegates to;
  • declared one master registry graph with artifact-level owners in the marketplace and Task Library;
  • added the definitive article → skill → job → receipt → meta article → regression test → source pull request → regenerated page loop;
  • added validator and unit-test coverage that fails on unmapped skills, orphan mappings, duplicate rows, or a package that claims canonical marketplace status before merge;
  • generated this meta article from the corrected release source.

This is recursive self-improvement before the first public release: a QA flag changed the candidate, added a test, regenerated the downstream pages, and forced a new release hash. The previous ZIP hash was superseded and was never published.

Evidence tier: E4 for the local source/test/archive chain after extracted-archive revalidation. This page is a candidate meta example, not an accepted Task Library historical-example record. Its proposed task mapping, reviewer, retrieval date, final URL, fingerprint, confidence, and limitations are recorded in registry/meta-example-candidates.json; canonical marketplace availability, Task Library registration, fresh-chat activation, scheduled firing, and independent adoption remain UNKNOWN until their own receipts exist.

This page is generated from examples/case-studies/05-one-master-learning-loop.md. Do not hand-edit the public copy.

Scroll to Top